Exclusive: Chime’s Slowdown Highlights Limits of Bank DisruptorsRead more

Chart by Mike Sullivan

The Information Investigation: Amazon Delivery Stations Have More Than Double the Injury Rate of Other Warehouses

Photo: Chart by Mike Sullivan

Working at an Amazon warehouse is more dangerous than working at the typical warehouse. But working at an Amazon delivery station, a small shipping hub where delivery vans whiz in and out daily, appears to be the most hazardous warehouse job of all.

In 2019 and 2020, injury rates at Amazon delivery stations were more than double the industry average, and higher than the rates for Amazon fulfillment centers, sortation centers and air hubs, according to The Information’s analysis of workplace injury data from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. And these injuries weren’t just minor scrapes or bruises. Companies only report to OSHA about those that require medical treatment beyond first aid, including serious injuries that cause the employee to miss work or have to transfer to a different position. Most of the injuries Amazon reported to OSHA fell in the latter two categories.

Amazon has opened hundreds of delivery stations across the country in the past two years as part of its effort to reduce its reliance on third-party shippers like UPS and the U.S. Postal Service. The breakneck pace of that expansion is also reflected by inaccurate submissions Amazon made to OSHA. The Information identified more than 100 instances where Amazon appears to have grossly overstated the number of employees working at delivery stations in 2019, based on The Information’s analysis of filings and press releases. Though the employee count for a particular facility does not affect OSHA’s injury rate calculations, it is unclear why Amazon misstated the figures and why it has yet to correct the filings.

Access on the go
View stories on our mobile app and tune into our weekly podcast.
Join live video Q&A’s
Deep-dive into topics like startups and autonomous vehicles with our top reporters and other executives.
Enjoy a clutter-free experience
Read without any banner ads.
Microsoft's Satya Nadella, left, and Peter Lee. Photo by Bloomberg, Microsoft
Exclusive
How Microsoft Swallowed Its Pride to Make a Massive Bet on OpenAI
Satya Nadella didn’t want to hear it. Last December, Peter Lee, who oversees Microsoft’s sprawling research efforts, was briefing Nadella, Microsoft’s CEO, and his deputies about a series of tests Microsoft had conducted of GPT-4, the then-unreleased new artificial intelligence large-language model built by OpenAI.
Art by Mike Sullivan
startups asia
Venture Capitalists Face Pressure to Divest From China
Silicon Valley venture capitalists are coming to terms with a new reality: Their once-prized China investments may be victims of a simmering cold war.
Chris Britt, co-founder and CEO of Chime.
Exclusive startups Finance
Chime’s Slowdown Highlights Limits of Bank Disruptors
Chime found a way to offer zero-fee banking services without being a bank itself. But that approach is starting to show its limits.
Chart by Mike Sullivan.
Data Point enterprise
Enterprise Software’s Laggards: Firms Growing Slowly And Still Burning Cash
It’s the age-old refrain in American business: You have to spend money to make money. And it’s particularly true of the tech industry, where startups pour millions into untested new businesses and technologies.
Graphic by Shane Burke. Photos via Shutterstock/Wikimedia.
facebook
How Meta’s Acquisition of Giphy Went South
When a U.K. antitrust regulator initially ordered Meta Platforms to sell Giphy 18 months ago, it hoped to ensure that the startup—a library for animated images known as GIFs—would prosper as an independent company.
Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai
Shareholder Advisory Firms Call for Alphabet Chair’s Ouster
Two influential shareholder advisory firms have taken an aggressive stance against Alphabet’s board of directors ahead of the company’s June 2 annual meeting, telling clients they should vote in favor of a majority of proposals submitted by shareholders to improve the company’s corporate governance—proposals the board hopes to squash.